The poem consists of 55 lines, disproportionately divided into six stanzas. This poem is a tribute to these men’s bravery and their ability to face death head-on as they charged into the “valley of death.” Analysis of The Charge of the Light Brigade”, Alfred Lord Tennyson The assault continued with backs turned, and very few soldiers made it back alive. Equipped with only swords, they broke the enemy line before heading back. Their commander’s mistake was realized as all 600 soldiers were assaulted with fire, yet the soldiers charged forward. As soldiers, they followed orders and didn’t question the command. These 600 soldiers belonged to a British cavalry unit, called the “Light Brigade.” For one and a half miles, these soldiers charged forward to face enemy forces, a Russian artillery unit with their cannons and guns. The poem “ The Charge of the Light Brigade“ tells a story about 600 soldiers who rode into the “valley of death” as he describes a battle during the Crimean War. And The Charge of the Light Brigade’s themes couldn’t be more pertinent in a nation still hobbled by class differences, jingoistic nostalgia and predilection for glorious self-harm.Noble six hundred! Summary of “The Charge of the Light Brigade”, Alfred Lord Tennyson Part of its timelessness is due to the absence of the 1960s makeup and hairstyling that have so dated other epics of the era (though Nolan’s hussar jacket found its way on to Jimi Hendrix, and then Adam Ant). Over half a century later, the film looks better than ever. “No damn business of anyone what is what. Wood gave John Osborne’s earlier draft a fleet-footed satirical makeover that renders the dialogue eccentric, hilarious, authentically Victorian-sounding and a constant delight to the ear. Yet none of Richardson’s other films ever quickened my pulse like this one, and only recently did it strike me that The Charge of the Light Brigade’s presiding genius was not its director but its writer: Charles Wood, the great but undervalued playwright and screenwriter who died in February. Monthly Film Bulletin called it “a well-nigh intolerable mess”. Wikipedia says the film’s reception was “generally positive” but I remember it as negative, exacerbated by the director’s refusal to screen it for the critics and a perception in conservative quarters that it cleaved to modish anti-war sentiments. It sparked in me an appetite for military history and big battle movies that persists to this day. Tramautised yet thrilled by my first grown-up taste of things ending badly, I rushed out and read everything I could find about the Crimean war, including the screenplay’s source material, Cecil Woodham-Smith’s The Reason Why. But oh no! For not only does Captain Nolan get hit by a piece of shrapnel before the charge has even properly begun – he is one of the reasons it all goes so horribly wrong! That heroic stance on the poster? It’s Nolan “screaming like a woman” (Lord Cardigan’s words) as he dies. I knew it would end in tears – I’d read Lord Tennyson’s poem – but confidently expected Nolan to emerge from the disaster, moustache slightly ruffled, to return to his beloved Clarissa. It culminates, of course, in one of the most notorious military blunders in history. The film takes a satirical scalpel to Victorian sociopolitical and military structures, fleshed out by a Who’s Who of Great British Acting led by Trevor Howard, at the top of his game as Lord Cardigan, John Gielgud as Lord Raglan, and Vanessa Redgrave, four inches taller than Hemmings, as Nolan’s love interest. Over the next two and a half hours, these Punch-inspired animations recur at intervals to provide ironic state-of-the-nation commentary (and fill in scenes too expensive to shoot as live action). The animated credit sequence (by the brilliant Richard Williams) proceeds to show the English lion letting out a mighty roar (a parody of the MGM studio ident) and putting on a policeman’s helmet, ready to restore order to the world, followed by an animated digest of the Industrial Revolution, with the British empire at its hub.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |